Academic Publishers Win Reversal of Court Ruling That Favored ‘E-Reserves’ at Georgia State
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
many%20other%20institutions.<%2Fa>%20It's%20already%20been%20more%20than%20six%20years%20since%20Cambridge,%20Oxford%20University%20Press,%20and%20SAGE%20Publications%20sued%20Georgia%20State<%2Fa>%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.bookbusinessmag.com%2Faggregatedcontent%2Facademic-publishers-win-reversal-court-ruling-that-favored-e-reserves-georgia-state%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="9946" type="icon_link">
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
How much copyrighted material can professors make available to students in online course reserves before they exceed the boundaries of educational fair use? That's the essential question at the heart of a long-running copyright-infringement lawsuit that has pitted three academic publishers against Georgia State University.
The answer matters not just to the parties to the case, Cambridge University Press et al. v. Carl V. Patton et al., but publishers, librarians, and professors at many other institutions. It's already been more than six years since Cambridge, Oxford University Press, and SAGE Publications sued Georgia State
0 Comments
View Comments
Related Content
Comments