Apple's Ebook Appeal: Toss Out The Verdict, Or Give Us A New Judge
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
AAPL<%2Fa>)%20pulled%20no%20punches%20in%20the%2065-page%20brief<%2Fa> it%20filed%20Tuesday,%20asking%20a%20higher%20court%20to%20overturn%20the%20controversial<%2Fa>%20results%20of%20last%20year's%20e-book%20antitrust%20trial%20and%20placing%20blame%20for%20the%20outcome%20squarely%20on%20the%20shoulders%20of%20the%20judge%20who%20heard%20the%20case.%0D%0A%0D%0A%20%20In%20Apple's%20view,%20U.S.%20District%20Judge%20Denise%20Cote%20was%20not%20only%20wrong%20about%20the%20law%20when%20she%20ruled%20that%20the%20company orchestrated%20a%20conspiracy%20with%20publishers%20to%20fix%20the%20price%20of%20e-books,%20she%20was%20wrong%20about%20the%20facts%20as%20well.%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.bookbusinessmag.com%2Faggregatedcontent%2Fapples-ebook-appeal-toss-out-the-verdict-or-give-us-a-new-judge%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="11491" type="icon_link">
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
Apple (AAPL) pulled no punches in the 65-page brief it filed Tuesday, asking a higher court to overturn the controversial results of last year's e-book antitrust trial and placing blame for the outcome squarely on the shoulders of the judge who heard the case.
In Apple's view, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote was not only wrong about the law when she ruled that the company orchestrated a conspiracy with publishers to fix the price of e-books, she was wrong about the facts as well.
0 Comments
View Comments
Related Content
Comments