We're rapidly approaching the time in which perpetual copyright hits its existing statutory limits -- so I've fully been expecting an increase in arguments for why copyright needs to be extended again. Of course, the actual economic evidence doesn't support this at all. Instead, the evidence suggests there's tremendous value in a broader public domain. So how will maximalists argue for copyright extension? If a recent paper from economist
Stan Liebowitz is any indication, it will be through strawmen and the argument that we should ignore the economics. Seriously....
Design & Formats for Boosting Direct Mail Response
Variable Data Printing Case Studies
