In previous columns, I've explored the strategic reasons to consider outsourcing distribution operations and the request for proposal (RFP) process for outsourced distribution partners. Now, let's assume that you have evaluated all the third-party proposals and selected the finalist among the various bids.
With the exception of implementation, evaluating the costs of in-sourced versus third-party distribution is the most complex step in the process of determining whether outsourcing is, in fact, in your company's best interest. The outcome of the evaluation process may well be the shutdown of your company's captive distribution operations, so a carefully constructed analysis is mandatory.
The evaluation should consider quantitative and qualitative factors of both the in-house and outsourced options, including the one-time transition costs that are associated with moving distribution operations to a third-party provider, and a forthright assessment of the on-going capital and operating costs of maintaining a captive operation.
It goes without saying that the evaluation should have a multi-year view and should consider "environmental factors"—i.e., how the business might change in the years ahead.
There is little doubt that print-on-demand and short-run digital printing are here to stay, and the recent iPad announcement augers well for the e-book. Both developments suggest that the need for fixed warehouse space is likely to decline in the years ahead,. Unless your organization has plans for a significant expansion in the publishing program or acquiring another company, you may find yourself with more space than you need or can afford. Looking carefully at the long-term is essential.
Evaluating Status Quo
Evaluating the status quo refers to projecting the baseline costs for the current in-house distribution operations, including anticipated changes in costs because of an expiring warehouse lease, ongoing maintenance and leasehold improvements—will the warehouse need a new roof next year?—and any planned productivity improvement initiatives.