In a court filing, Open Road attorneys last week assailed what it called HarperCollins' "extreme" proposal for an injunction and more than $1.1 million in legal fees and damages to settle claims stemming from Open Road's unauthorized e-book edition of Jean Craighead George's Julie of the Wolves.
Claiming that the Harper proposal is based on "a misleading portrayal" of the facts, Open Road attorneys argued that not only has Harper not suffered the kind of irreparable harm necessary to justify its proposed remedy, in fact it has not suffered any harm at all.
0 Comments
View Comments
- Companies:
- HarperCollins
Related Content
Comments
%0D%0A%20%20Claiming%20that%20the%20Harper%20proposal%20is%20based%20on%20"a%20misleading%20portrayal"%20of%20the%20facts,%20Open%20Road%20attorneys%20argued%20that%20not%20only%20has%20Harper%20not%20suffered%20the%20kind%20of%20irreparable%20harm%20necessary%20to%20justify%20its%20proposed%20remedy,%20in%20fact%20it%20has%20not%20suffered%20any%20harm%20at%20all.%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.bookbusinessmag.com%2Faggregatedcontent%2Fopen-road-fires-back-harpercollins-copyright-case%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="11115" type="icon_link"> Email Email
0 Comments Comments