Editor's Note: Noise Pollution: Why more data isn't better data
What Nate Silver's "The Signal and the Noise" can teach publishers
By
Brian Howard
Turns out all that new information was creating confusion, and factions around the ways people chose to interpret it. The deluge of ideas—good, bad and ugly—was outstripping our ancestors' abilities to absorb and comprehend it.
It's an apt warning for what's happening in the wake of the recent computer- and Internet-driven information explosions. And it's a good lens through which to view what we're experiencing in publishing.
0 Comments
View Comments
E
Brian Howard
Author's page
Related Content
Comments
%0D%0A%20%20Silver%20holds%20an%20exalted%20position%20as%20a%20high%20priest%20of%20political%20statistical%20analysis;%20his%20model%20for%20crunching%20polling%20data%20in%202008%20proved%20eerily%20accurate.%20As%20publishing%20moves%20into%20an%20era%20of%20big%20data,%20there's%20much%20to%20be%20gleaned%20from%20Silver's%20cool%20approach%20to%20information.%20Silver's%20stance%20is%20that,%20contrary%20to%20conventional%20wisdom,%20more%20information%20is%20not%20necessarily%20a%20good%20thing,%20and%20certainly%20not%20right%20away.<%2Fspan>%0D%0A%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.bookbusinessmag.com%2Farticle%2Fnoise-pollution-nate-silver-signal-noise-publishing%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="2518" type="icon_link"> Email Email
0 Comments Comments